Art work?This is from the Victor Hugo collection titled "crack head Jesus"
What is this crap?
Someone please explain to me, I'm not very bright, why I or anyone pay for something this stupid? I'm damn sure my 5 year old grandson can do better.
As I understand it, this is all the rage in L.A.
5 comments:
From the night crew at a highly prestigious L.A. Company,
Art is art in the eye of the beholder.
What's art to you, isn't necessarily art to someone else.
Art is meant to be expressive in any creative form, and is perhaps one of the few purest freedoms left.
We are in AMERICA aren't we?
Your blog only proves no should criticize people because of where they live unless they have actually lived there, and not just for a week.
Living proof that dumbasses exist everywhere. Not the artist, he was smart enough to throw some paint on a canvas and laugh as the masses pay allot for it. I applaud the artist in the way he takes advantage of one of the basic freedoms we enjoy in America. Being stupid and throwing your money away on junk. And yes art is in the eye of the beholder. I behold no art here.
Sir:
Imagine what would have happened if you had your eyes opened and bought a Jackson Pollack back in the day.
Oh, my mistake.
Chances are you're clueless about who he is based on your callous remark.
Who is really the "D.A." now?
People with real Pollack Art don't work for a living, they can afford NOT to.
But then, in your eyes, his work isn't art either.
Look, I know I have ruffled some feathers. Good it about time we wake up and start seeing and calling things for what they are. First to call this art is offensive to my senses. Second to call it "crack head Jesus" as in Christ is more offensive to my religious believes. A better title would be; "A picture I made to sell for lots of money" Then this would be calling it what it is. You can call it art, I and i'm sure many others call it another way.
Art is any creation that causes an emotional response. Clearly, this piece did that for you. Therefore, it's art.
Post a Comment